| 140 | | - Ability to do batch jobs, i.e. large number of proteins annotated by our software (request came from many)[[BR]] |
| 141 | | - ANNOTATOR should be downloadable and deployable somewhere local[[BR]] |
| 142 | | - We were offered a potential collaboration in terms of using computing power of a Titec TSUBAME supercomputer. This means the ANNOTATOR's jobs need a mechanism to be submitted to an external site.[[BR]] |
| 143 | | - For better results, consistency and the ability to replicate the annotator pipeline in a remote location, we need periodic and automatic updation of the underlying databases of the algorithms.[[BR]] |
| 144 | | - How differences between ANNOTATOR and InterProscan[[BR]] |
| 145 | | - Ability to save results of analysis as xml format for further analysis[[BR]] |
| | 140 | * Ability to do batch jobs, i.e. large number of proteins annotated by our software (request came from many)[[BR]] |
| | 141 | * ANNOTATOR should be downloadable and deployable somewhere local[[BR]] |
| | 142 | * We were offered a potential collaboration in terms of using computing power of a Titec TSUBAME supercomputer. This means the ANNOTATOR's jobs need a mechanism to be submitted to an external site.[[BR]] |
| | 143 | * For better results, consistency and the ability to replicate the annotator pipeline in a remote location, we need periodic and automatic updation of the underlying databases of the algorithms.[[BR]] |
| | 144 | * How differences between ANNOTATOR and InterProscan[[BR]] |
| | 145 | * Ability to save results of analysis as xml format for further analysis[[BR]] |
